The least-obvious-most-important reason for a programme plan

3 Minutes
·
28 July 2026
A black and white professional headshot of Damian Fessey, Managing Partner at Oxford8
Damian Fessey
Managing Partner, Oxford8

There is a whole host of reasons why programmes need plans, but one of the most important is so often overlooked, and it’s this: You only get two chances to find out whether somebody can deliver a piece of work.  The second chance is during delivery itself, by which time it’s too late: If they aren’t capable, you’re already into the quagmire of slippage, re-work and burn-rate.  So success depends on the first occasion – the actual planning of the work.

Let’s put that in management-speak: “There is a very high correlation between the ability to plan and the ability to deliver.”  Or, as the Scots might say: “If ya cannae plan it, ya probably cannae do it.”

So, as the executive sponsor, how do you make it happen?  We always advise a few simple rules:

1. Whoever is doing the work should plan it

Wherever possible, require that the person doing the work should plan the work. If this rule isn’t followed, two bad things happen. The first is that the plan is devoid of the very expertise needed to inform it. Secondly, there isn’t the psychological buy-in and rigour that naturally occurs when the person setting expectations is the same person who will be held to account. Those are both vital ingredients in an executable plan. 

2. Plan, then triangulate

Once you’ve got the plan, as the executive sponsor, go and triangulate. Go to the engine room: It’s what we do. Sit with your subject matter expert just for 15 minutes and talk through their bit of the plan, and you’ll get a sense of whether it’s realistic or not. I once did that with a test manager who used the word ‘compressed’ 35 times in 30 minutes to describe a plan. What he was trying to tell me was that his plan had been ludicrously tightly time-boxed for him.  I got the message.

3. Don't guess, measure

Don’t let the team estimate or guess about work that can actually be measured. Lots of things on programmes are high volume and repetitive; test scripts are a classic example. Make the team invest time up front to do a few, see how long it takes and factor in that speed will improve with time. Voilà.They’re no longer guessing, they’re measuring. If you really want to drive home the point, give the team a swear box with the largest fines reserved for phrases like ‘feels like’ and ‘should be’.

4. Planning protects people

Sell the team on the benefits of planning. It’s part of your leadership role. Planning protects people. It’s the only mechanism that protects the team from chaos, unrealistic expectations, long working days, the mistakes that accompany them, burnout, and the toxicity that becomes the hallmark of a death-march programme.

5. Train, then plan

And finally, the ‘sharpening the axe’ bit: Train the team to plan, upfront. Training is not a natural act: It needs to be taught. And it’s a bit like sports. If you want them to be a winning team in the planning phase, they need to train as a team, not just turn up and play the fixture. It takes two days to train properly, and the return on investment will outpace any other investment you will make during the programme.

A black and white professional headshot of Damian Fessey, Managing Partner at Oxford8
Damian Fessey
Managing Partner, Oxford8

Damian Fessey is a founder member of Oxford8.  His prior career encompasses three decades of programme delivery, as well as an extended tenure as a non-executive advisor to HM Govt Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.  He is a graduate of the MSc in Major Programme Management at the Saïd Business School, University of Oxford.

5 Minute Read
·
29 July 2025
What started life as a joke from the movie ‘Airplane!’ created some great insights into management behaviours in a crisis. For those who've never seen the aviation comedy classic ‘Airplane!’, there’s...
Damian Fessey
Managing Partner
3 Minute Read
·
5 August 2025
I’ve worked and lived in London for most of the past thirty years. It hasn’t been a ‘static’ experience: One of the great things about being in London is the ricocheting...
Damian Fessey
Managing Partner
3 Minute Read
·
8 August 2025
Anybody who has attended a programme management event in the last ten years has probably witnessed at least one debate on the definition of programme assurance. Usually it’s an ideological battle...
Damian Fessey
Managing Partner

Pinned

3 Minutes

·

21 April 2026
There’s a scene I’ve watched play out umpteen times over the past three decades. The setting is the boardroom, and the starring role is played by a question that I’ve seen posed by some of the most astute non-execs I’ve had the pleasure of knowing. Usually it is directed to the member of the c-suite who is designated as the executive sponsor of the current over-running, over-spending, slippage-laden transformation programme.
8 Minutes

·

26 August 2025
Being ‘a programme geek’ at social events is rather like being a doctor. Whereas doctors get a constant unsolicited litany of guests’ medical symptoms, programme geeks instead get to hear all about ‘the programme that goes wrong’; the tale of the high-stakes, transformational initiative at work that is taking three times as long, costing three times as much, delivering only a third of what it promised, and more importantly is draining the life-force and good humour out of the organisation.

Pinned

5 Minutes

·

2 June 2026
One of my (many) formative experiences in programme delivery was working with a banking client in 2018 right when TSB’s troubled data migration hit the headlines. It was variously described as a ‘meltdown’ and a ‘fiasco’ in the popular press, who carried stories on a daily basis ranging from customers being unable to pay their mortgages or access their accounts, through to one mythical account holder who had supposedly found an extra £5m in his bank account.
3 Minutes

·

8 August 2025
Anybody who has attended a programme management event in the last ten years has probably witnessed at least one debate on the definition of programme assurance. Usually it’s an ideological battle between various camps of theorists and methodologists, where words like ‘confidence’ and ‘likelihood of success’ are bandied about quite liberally.

Pinned

5 Minutes

·

2 June 2026
One of my (many) formative experiences in programme delivery was working with a banking client in 2018 right when TSB’s troubled data migration hit the headlines. It was variously described as a ‘meltdown’ and a ‘fiasco’ in the popular press, who carried stories on a daily basis ranging from customers being unable to pay their mortgages or access their accounts, through to one mythical account holder who had supposedly found an extra £5m in his bank account.

Pinned

3 Minutes

·

21 April 2026
There’s a scene I’ve watched play out umpteen times over the past three decades. The setting is the boardroom, and the starring role is played by a question that I’ve seen posed by some of the most astute non-execs I’ve had the pleasure of knowing. Usually it is directed to the member of the c-suite who is designated as the executive sponsor of the current over-running, over-spending, slippage-laden transformation programme.
8 Minutes

·

26 August 2025
Being ‘a programme geek’ at social events is rather like being a doctor. Whereas doctors get a constant unsolicited litany of guests’ medical symptoms, programme geeks instead get to hear all about ‘the programme that goes wrong’; the tale of the high-stakes, transformational initiative at work that is taking three times as long, costing three times as much, delivering only a third of what it promised, and more importantly is draining the life-force and good humour out of the organisation.

Pinned

5 Minutes

·

2 June 2026
One of my (many) formative experiences in programme delivery was working with a banking client in 2018 right when TSB’s troubled data migration hit the headlines. It was variously described as a ‘meltdown’ and a ‘fiasco’ in the popular press, who carried stories on a daily basis ranging from customers being unable to pay their mortgages or access their accounts, through to one mythical account holder who had supposedly found an extra £5m in his bank account.

Pinned

3 Minutes

·

21 April 2026
There’s a scene I’ve watched play out umpteen times over the past three decades. The setting is the boardroom, and the starring role is played by a question that I’ve seen posed by some of the most astute non-execs I’ve had the pleasure of knowing. Usually it is directed to the member of the c-suite who is designated as the executive sponsor of the current over-running, over-spending, slippage-laden transformation programme.